Subject: RE: [xsl] attribute order From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:52:03 -0000 |
> > (There is universal consensus that in XML, element order is > important but > > attribute order isn't. There is nothing explicit in the XML > specification > > that says this, but it's made clear in the definition of > the InfoSet.) > > Actually a sentence making this explicit was added in XML 2e: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006-review.html#sec-starttags > > ... Note that the order of attribute specifications in a start-tag or > empty-element tag is not significant. > But did they get round to saying that the order of elements *WAS* significant? Mike K XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] attribute order, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] attribute order, Daniel Veillard |
RE: [xsl] attribute order, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] repost - string compariso, Kirk Allen Evans |
Month |