Subject: Re: [xsl] Difference between these NameSpaces... From: Peter Davis <pdavis152@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:11:54 -0800 |
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 01:33, Trevor Nash wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:47:21 -0800, Peter Davis wrote: > > To pick up on one thing in an otherwise accurate post: > >"http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl" is the URL for the current version of the > > XSLT specification. Whoops, pasted the wrong URL. I meant of course that "http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt" is the latest HTML version of the specification. I just knew I made some stupid error when I posted this :) Kinda like when you leave for a long vacation, you just know you forgot something... Thanks for pointing that out. > > To be pedantic, that takes you to the latest working draft of XSL (no > T) which happens to be the 1.0 recommendation, and refers to XSLT 1.0. > Which is where the document Microsoft read *used* to be. > > To go to the current version of XSLT (today thats XSLT 1.0) use: > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt" (with a 't') > > By current version I mean the latest recommendation rather than the > latest working draft. > > Regards, > Trevor Nash -- Peter Davis There you go man, Keep as cool as you can. It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave. Keep on being free! XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Difference between these , Trevor Nash | Thread | Re: [xsl] display parts of XML tree, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] spurious attribute, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Transform into text or bmp, Jean . Ossmann |
Month |