Re: [xsl] More efficient way than following-sibling?

[Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael,

This is not all that big a deal, but what you have is much the same as:

<xsl:apply-templates select="$TheNode/following-sibling::*[1]" mode="generic"/>

and then, instead of a template called by name, a mode:

<xsl:template match="*" mode="generic">
...
</xsl:template>

This will work since the apply-templates will simply fail in the event that 
no first following sibling element exists. So you don't have to wrap the 
call in a conditional.

Is that something like what you were after?

But it's the following:: axis that's the real killer, not following-sibling::.

Cheers,
Wendell

At 02:45 PM 3/20/2002, you wrote:
> I am trying to find a more efficient way to determine if a node has
> siblings, and then access the next sibling.
>
> Currently, I am running the following XSLT code:
>
> <xsl:if test="$TheNode/following-sibling::node()">
>  <xsl:call-template name="GenericTemplate">
>   <xsl:with-param name="TheNode" select="$TheNode/following-sibling::*[1]"/>
>  </xsl:call-template>
> </xsl:if>
>
> However, this is very expensive, when it comes to large XML documents.
>
> Does anyone know a more efficient way to do this?
>
> --Michael Glick
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list