Re: [xsl] XML parsers performance

[Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:00:16PM +0100, Bovone Stefano wrote:
> Hello everybody.
> 
> I'm dealing with XML parsers performance. In your experience what is the
> speeder parser ?
> Do I have to choose a C++ or a Java parser ?
> 
> (I have to work with very big XML file and using mainly SAX)

  Then it seems it is off topic for this list

  Latest experiemnt on a duron 1.2GHz wityh libxml2 SAX parser on 
a 20MBytes file is that it get processed at 16 MBytes/s

paphio:~/XML -> time ./testSAX --quiet db100000.xml 
3200006 callbacks generated
real 0m1.285s user 0m1.170s sys 0m0.100s
paphio:~/XML -> ls -l db100000.xml 
-rw-rw-r--    1 veillard www      20182040 Mar 20 10:30 db100000.xml
paphio:~/XML ->

 the input file was generated using the perl script from XSLTMark
Note that the SAX interface used is based on James Clark expat one.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list