|
Subject: Re: [xsl] mystery #2: testing document() without failure From: Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 13 Apr 2002 12:12:18 -0400 |
>>>>> "M" == Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
M> Yes, it's explicitly implementation-defined what happens when
M> the document referred to by the document() function doesn't
M> exist. Either you get an error, or you get an empty node-set.
Or, as in the Xalan case, you get both for no extra charge ;)
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@xxxxxxxxxxx> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] mystery #2: testing docum, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] XSLT faq back on line, Dave Pawson |
| Re: [xsl] mystery #1: document() wi, Gary Lawrence Murphy | Date | Re: [xsl] mystery #3: rendering emb, Gary Lawrence Murphy |
| Month |