Subject: RE: [xsl] why is it worked out? From: Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:43:28 +0300 |
Heppa, > <xsl:if test="not(following-sibling::item[not(@db-end) and > not(@db-start)] > or > following-sibling::item > )"> > surprisingly enough to me it worked allright. > could someone please explane what is going on inside of test=""? "If there are following "item" siblings or following "item" siblings that do not have "db-end" or "db-start" attributes, evaluate to false; otherwise evaluate to true." ... I think... Santtu XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] why is it worked out?, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] XML transformation using XALA, Najmi, Jamal |
Re: [xsl] (text processing) lexical, Joerg Heinicke | Date | RE: [xsl] why is it worked out?, Michael Kay |
Month |