Subject: Re: [xsl] passing intermediate result while recursively building nodeset From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 15:52:39 +0100 |
> If 1.1 can't handle this, will it be something that 2.0 will be able to do? in 1.1 (or 1.0 using xx:node-set() ) the way to model a list of elements is to make them siblings of each other. so if $x holds a root node containing <a i=1/><a i=2/> then <xsl:with-param name="x"> <xsl:copy-of select="$x"/> <a i="3"/> </xsl:with-param> will pass on $x containing a root node with three children. that;s 1.1 syntax, in 1.o it would be <xsl:variable name="xx"> <xsl:copy-of select="$x"/> <a i="3"/> </xsl:with-param> ... <xsl:with-param name="x" select="saxon:node-set($xx)"/> David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] passing intermediate result w, paul morgan | Thread | Re: [xsl] passing intermediate resu, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] passing intermediate result w, paul morgan | Date | [xsl] Re: passing intermediate resu, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |