Subject: Re: [xsl] Variable : string or temporary tree From: "Siarhei Biarozkin" <sberyozkin@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:28:27 +0100 |
OK, thanks for your help ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [xsl] Variable : string or temporary tree > > > But I can apply / to a temporary tree if version is "1.1" when analyzing > > variables, can't I ? > > beware that XSLT 1.1 was never standardised (and never will be) the > working group released one draft for comment then announced that they > had decided not to do 1.1 and would work instead on 2.0. > > So a a couple of implementations implement that 1.1 _draft- and yes in > 1.1 as in 2.0 you can do this. But 1.1 is an orphan draft with no > official standing. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Variable : string or temp, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Iden, Stuart Celarier |
Re: [xsl] Variable : string or temp, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] foreign keys in a xml-dat, ChivaBaba |
Month |