Re: [xsl] XSLT performance under Linux

[Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:15:02PM -0700, Kurt Cagle wrote:
> I would recommend working with the xsltproc engine. It's C++ based, supports
> a healthy subset of the Saxon parser, and is fast. I had something of a
> jury-rigged system where I was calling saxon as a jar from the command line
> (invoked from an `` expression in perl) and my system was crawling despite
> being on a top of the line computer. I replaced it with xsltproc, and it was
> a couple of orders of magnitude faster. It should be in most recent Linux
> distros, though it's also up on Source Forge.

  Hum, is there another xsltproc out there ? The one I work on is in C
and hosted at http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ (the CVS base is the one from
the GNOME project).
  If it's the same, thanks for your positive review :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list