Subject: Re:Re: [xsl] regarding the extension library From: "william locksman" <vsd18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 15 May 2002 10:16:01 -0000 |
/** * Constructor for the StringUtils object */ public StringUtils() { }
/** * Description of the Method * *@param str Description of the Parameter *@return Description of the Return Value */
and instantiate the class com.xyz.StrUtils???? thanks
From: Greg Faron <gfaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] regarding the extension library Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:12:10 -0600
At 05:13 AM 5/14/2002, you wrote:I have then formed my own utility class that returns the string in the
uppercase( just for test purpose ). This Class is StrUtils which has a
method called upperCase()that takes the String to be converted to the
uppercase and returns String in uppercase.
This works fine too. My question is that in my Example, where is the
instantiation being done?? I have not done anything like
com.xyz.StrUtils.new()... so how is it working??
what is the theory behind the object instantiation when it comes to
extension libraries??
You didn't show us the Java method source. Is it by any chance a
"static" method?
Greg Faron Integre Technical Publishing Co.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] regarding the extension l, Greg Faron | Thread | [xsl] why is this invalid in xml?, Jakub . Valenta |
[xsl] How can a template match elem, ChivaBaba | Date | Re: [xsl] A better way to build a c, John Sands |
Month |