Subject: RE: [xsl] Passing a parameter from one matched template to another From: "Stuart Celarier" <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:18:54 -0700 |
Paul, > I have this tendency (for which I was previously chided) to try to > condense my examples to what I consider to be the essentials. Because I > didn't consider what happens in the default case to be of any importance > to my query, I left it out. I really appreciate people who take the time to reduce examples to a bare minimum case! And so often, when I do that myself, I find the answer is staring me in the face and I don't have to ask the question. There is a quote (often misattributed to Einstein) Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler. When you think about it, that can be a very fine line indeed. A quick sanity check is to drop your sample into a web browser and see if it can parse the XML. Something I think I don't need to do from time to time, much to my own chagrin. Cheers, Stuart XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Passing a parameter from , paul morgan | Thread | [xsl] read records from database in, Ming |
Re: [xsl] A better way to build a c, Joerg Heinicke | Date | [xsl] Weird variable scoping rules, Graham Ashton |
Month |