Subject: RE: [xsl] Document() and & From: "Stuart Celarier" <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:00:01 -0700 |
>But you do if you want the URL string to be well-formed XML as would be >needed for use in the document() function. Tom, I must not be understanding you correctly. The URL string has to be well-formed XML? When I write document("secondary.xml"), I am pretty sure the string "secondary.xml" does not have a document element, XML declaration, etc. That string does not look like well-formed XML to me, it looks like a relative URL for a file. What are you trying to say? Cheers, Stuart XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Document() and &, Thomas B. Passin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Document() and &, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Syntax Assistance Needed, Stuart Celarier | Date | Re: [xsl] Document() and &, David Carlisle |
Month |