RE: [xsl] Document() and &

> On the other hand, the version of Xalan 1 that I tried 
> claimed that the url was malformed, and that's wrong.  That's a bug.
> 
> So you need to determine whether the operation fails because 
> an html file is not well-formed, or because the xslt 
> processor has a problem with the url syntax - which would be 
> a bug because that syntax is correct.
> 

Technically not a bug but a restriction: it's entirely up to the XSLT
implementor to decide what forms of URL are supported.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Document() and &, (continued) Mike Brown - Fri, 17 May 2002 11:54:45 -0600 (MDT) Stuart Celarier - Fri, 17 May 2002 12:16:48 -0700 Zack Brown - Fri, 31 May 2002 11:23:40 -0700 Thomas B. Passin - Fri, 17 May 2002 11:05:52 -0400 Michael Kay - Sun, 19 May 2002 07:35:30 +0100 <= Oleg Tkachenko - Wed, 15 May 2002 18:35:14 +0200 Josh Beach - Wed, 15 May 2002 17:59:48 +0200 Oleg Tkachenko - Wed, 15 May 2002 21:54:40 +0200 Josh Beach - Wed, 15 May 2002 15:59:52 +0200

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Document() and &, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Document() and &, Thomas B. Passin	Thread	Re: [xsl] Document() and &, Oleg Tkachenko
RE: [xsl] Regarding XSL performance, Michael Kay	Date	RE: [xsl] testing for following sib, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Document() and &amp;

RE: [xsl] Document() and &