<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance...

Subject: RE: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance...
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:28:07 +0100
>Comparing Xalan-C++ using a wrapper around another implementation's DOM
and Saxon using its 
>native implementation is hardly a fair comparison.

Of course it's fair. It provides a counterweight to all those people who
compare Xalan with its own native tree implementation to Saxon with a
third-party DOM!

Actually the lesson is important. All XSLT processors perform better if
they are allowed to build the tree themselves than if you supply a DOM
that was built using unrelated software.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance..., David N Bertoni/Camb Thread [xsl] SetInclude Code Fragment, NILESH PATEL
RE: [xsl] comparison of attribute v, Michael Kay Date RE: [xsl] How to do serversite tran, Michael Kay
Month