Subject: RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:06:17 +0200 |
David Carlisle wrote: >Some of you may have seen the debate over on xml-dev started by >Tim Bray's message: >http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200206/msg00039.html >Which is basically to a pointer to a message of James Clark: >http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00217.html >In the message James discusses some unfortunate aspects of W3C Schema >and the bad effects that standardising on a badly specified language >(W3C Schema) over (say) Relax NG would have (admittedly James as a >co-author of Relax NG might not be the most impartial judge...). >He was talking abut use within IETF protocols, but when we look at the >damage being inflicted to XPath in XPath2 by tying it so closely to W3C >Schema, I think maybe there are some lessons to be learned, and maybe it >us still not too late to get the Working Groups to change course on >Xpath. Do you think it's possible to get them to change course? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] James Clark on Schema, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Initializing global variables, trang_nguyen | Date | RE: [xsl] Identifing links in text, Andrew Welch |
Month |