Subject: Re: [xsl] Improving efficiency of an XPath expression? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:50:10 +0100 |
> don't think I can afford the > overhead of keeping validation. you don't need to validate, you can use a non validating parser with a one line dtd that _only_ declares id to be of type ID. the overhead of that is a lot less than the overhead of evaluating // (I'd guess, but don't trust me on implementation issues) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Improving efficiency of a, Michael Beddow | Thread | Re: [xsl] Improving efficiency of a, Michael Beddow |
RE: [xsl] Improving efficiency of a, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Variable containing tree, Filipe Correia |
Month |