Subject: RE: [xsl] Grouping and Sorting on value inside group From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:16:39 -0500 |
> It's not the key() function that's reducing it to a single node, it's the > generate-id() function you are running on the nodes returned by key(). .4] [snip] > Beyond this I think Tom S. explained it. Yes, what I meant was that perhaps I should be a little more explicit in what I'm passing into the key function when I generate the keys. However, I find that I actually do understand what's going on now, although my understanding on how to get keys to always return the results I expect remains a little foggy (more experimentation needed). >But I'm confused not having the examples in front of me. Would you be able >to snip them out (again) and recapitulate the question if I'm not getting >what you're asking? At this point I don't think its worth you spending more time on it. I just made one other reply a bit ago that may help explain the bit you where "missing". It does have some open questions that I could use some opinions on, but I'm pretty much ok with the way the grouping is currently working. The exception is the open question on why I can't get the key to replace the //dataset reference to work. That's what I'll play with over the next couple of days. I may end up posting back to the list again, but I'm starting to suspect there's a way to restructure the whole set of templates to deal with the data with a different line of attack that may make the whole issue go away... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Grouping and Sorting on v, Hunsberger, Peter | Thread | RE: [xsl] Grouping and Sorting on v, McNally, David |
RE: [xsl] Detecting the last page o, Dunning, John | Date | RE: [xsl] variables in sort statem, TSchutzerWeissmann |
Month |