Re: [xsl] Hello World

Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World
From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:02:38 +0100
the smallest,yes

but some non-conformant xslt processors, or older processors sometimes choke
on the it.

*gasp* it is true .

howdy all !

cheers, jim fuller

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World


>
> > What would be the simplest possible XSL "Hello World" that
> > eliminates as many possible sources of failure as possible?
>
> probably this is the smallest hello world stylesheet:
>
> <html xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
xsl:version="1.0">Hello World</html>
>
> David
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread