Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:22:52 +0100 |
> bug. But what's worse: If you change it to a stylesheet which produces > valid xml output, Mozilla crashes - at least on my system. I also confirm this.....geez, dont the nice people at Mozilla org understand that a valid XSLT processor is something that is important ( ok not all important), there are at least 20-30 bugs ( from very small to 'not gonna use this' ), not too mention that sJS cripting control of XSLT transforms uses another syntax, yes I understand but why not step back a little for compatibility / interoperabilities sake, the idea of distributing processing was heralded a long time ago, but remains a dream on the clientside, most of which i put down to forced differentiation for product reasons rather then technical. I remember seeing somewhere a few years ago an XSLT torture test, is there such a thing as a conformance suite of XSLT tests anywhere ? Also why haven't any of the browsers made it easy to plug in 'something else' I envisage a simple JAXP/TRAX (any comment on c/c++ effort would be great ) type handling thingy, In fact I see a very simple standard scripting language that is in xml syntax ( bypassing all JS type script ) that handles JAXP type operations..... I would rather have heterogeneity in my choices of XSLT processor, rather then in my output. cheers, jim fuller XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Hello World, Joerg Heinicke | Thread | Re: [xsl] Hello World, J.Pietschmann |
Re: [xsl] Hello World, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL problem with displayi, Joerg Heinicke |
Month |