Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 format-number() question

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 format-number() question
From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:23:10 -0600 (MDT)
Michael Kay wrote:
> The standard conversion rules for passing arguments to functions in
> XPath 2.0 are documented in the XPath 2.0 specification
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/) section 2.2.4. I suspect there are bugs
> in the current description of these rules, but the general principles
> are sound. I think the XSLT spec probably shouldn't say anything about
> the conversions that are applied, this is entirely an XPath matter.

Right, but I still think the first sentence you wrote, above, or even just a
mention that XPath 2.0 is the place to look, would be better than "the
standard conversion rules". There doesn't seem to be any drawback to being 
just slightly more specific.

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________________
  mike j. brown                   |  xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/
  denver/boulder, colorado, usa   |  resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread