RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0100
> 
> Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ?
> 
I'm still thinking about that. XPath 1.0 doesn't allow the processor to
re-order the branches of an "and" expression (the behavior in error
cases might be different); but XPath 2.0 does allow it.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread