Subject: RE: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bound XML? From: sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 16:41:47 -0400 |
Ouch! you're right. Some of the interactivity is tied. Sara > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Rahtz > [mailto:sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:03 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bound XML? > > > > today -- or just have browser aware output. And of course, > > it requires that your XML is already pretty much in order > > and fully complete for rendering. > > Unless I am mistaken, it also requires that CSS be enhanced. > Suppose my otherwise ready-for-frying XML file contains > > <xref url="www.microsoft.com">the gates of hell</xref> > and > <figure url="somestupidpenguin.jpg"/> > > I never did understand how to explain via CSS that these > are respectively a link and an inline image. is not CSS > completely tied to the semantics of HTML elements? > > -- > Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager > 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bou, Thomas B. Passin | Thread | RE: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bou, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] XSL Lint was: Schema Opti, J.Pietschmann | Date | Re: [xsl] Sending parameters to sty, J.Pietschmann |
Month |