Subject: RE: [xsl] more encoding woe From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:51:06 +0100 |
Is this just a missing font Andrew? If you have the Unicode code point, all you *should* need is the font which has them. Do you have the M$ Unicode font installed? regards DaveP > I need the symbols for the following character entities to > appear in my > output - Ive looked up their encoding (ISO 9573-13) and used that (in > <meta>), but all I get is the usual box... I know David Carlisle knows > his mathML so hopefully he will have come across these before :) > > <root> > <node>aleph - ℵ</node> - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] more encoding woe, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] more encoding woe, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] more encoding woe, David Carlisle |
Month |