Subject: Re: [xsl] Converting Strict XHTML + CSS with XSLT From: "patrick andries" <patrick.andries@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:05:30 -0700 |
----- Message d'origine ----- De: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Hi Patrick, > > > I understand this (I was already around when Bos and Lie presented > > it in some conference), but why does CSS3 for example not also > > specify an XML syntax that browser would understand ? This syntax > > that could then become, after a suitable transitional period, the > > only acceptable one. > > Dunno (well, I imagine it's partly to do with distancing CSS from > XSL). You could try asking on www-style@xxxxxxx The expected answer I got until now is : we like it terse... write your own program or use SAC to parse CSS (in Perl, C or Java) and transform it to XML if you want. ---------------- Unicode en français (texte normatif, annotations, tous les caractères 3.2) http://hapax.iquebec.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Converting Strict XHTML +, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Converting Strict XHTML +, J.Pietschmann |
[xsl] The solution (Was: Re: Design, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] key() question?, Michael Kay |
Month |