Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt 2 grouping From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:32:39 -0400 |
No, but it looks like the xslt 2 group-by would be along the right lines, a solution based roughly along the lines of what you have below is still running 15 minutes later.
Though I hadn't used the generate-id test for uniqueness Ken, that would be a more efficient solution, I'll try it.
-- Upcoming: 3-days XSLT/XPath and/or 2-days XSL-FO:Sep 30-Oct 4,2002
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (Fax:-0995) ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN 1-894049-07-1 Practical Formatting Using XSLFO XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML/OmniMark services, books (electronic, printed), articles, training (instructor-live,Internet-live,web/CD,licensed) Next public training: 2002-08-05,26,27,09-30,10-03
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt 2 grouping, J.Pietschmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt 2 grouping, McNally, David |
RE: [xsl] node vrs node//node?, Hunsberger, Peter | Date | Re: [xsl] node vrs node//node?, Jeni Tennison |
Month |