Subject: [xsl] XalanC++: 'Xalan' versus 'testXSLT', XML Schema support? From: "Edward L. Knoll" <ed.knoll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:36:44 -0600 |
I appologize if this is repost. I sent it a couple of days ago and haven't seen any replies or seen the question show up in the digest. 1) What's the differences between the Xalan C++ 'Xalan' and 'testXSLT' executables? Why would I select one over the other? 2) I'm starting to check into XML validation. My thought was to go the XML Schema route as opposed to the DTD route. Do either of the XalanC++ processors support validation via XML Schema? If not is there something else I could utilize which does? I'd prefer standalone/prebuilt executables? We're attempting to do all of our XML/XSL processing without doing any programming (other than writing XML/XSL files). Thanks, Ed Knoll -- Edward L. Knoll Phone (work) : (719)484-2717 e-mail (work) : f49660c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx e-mail (business): eknoll@xxxxxxxxxx e-mail (personal): edward@xxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Non-well-formed HTML in X, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] XalanC++: 'Xalan' versus , James Fuller |
RE: [xsl] node responding to ancest, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] urgent - carriage return,, tpass001 |
Month |