Subject: Re: [xsl] in XSL other than d-o-e ? From: "Jochen Metzger" <j.metzger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:25:00 +0200 |
Hi, > yes just use   instead of all of that. is an entity defined > to be #160 in ___HTML___ so if you are not using (X)HTML (for instance > if you are using XSLT you either need to make a similar definition of > nbsp or (more simply) just use   directly. Thanks for all your outstanding answers. That was really great stuff. This mailing list is really kewl ;o) I how I can contribute some stuff in the future. Cheers Jochen XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] in XSL other than , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] in XSL other than , Joerg Heinicke |
RE: [xsl] strings and recursive tem, Jarno . Elovirta | Date | RE: [xsl] The longest node in a nod, DPawson |
Month |