Subject: Re: [xsl] math get maximum and subtract 1 From: "sascha" <sascha@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:11:18 +0200 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > In the new input, the DESCRIPTION_ITEM elements are ordered such that > all the cells for a particular row are clustered together. The first > of each cluster is the one whose col attribute has the value 0. The > rest of the cells in the row are the next N DESCRIPTION_ITEMs, where N > is the number of columns minus 1. One way you could select them is: > > . | following-sibling::DESCRIPTION_ITEM[position() < $ncols] > > Another way you could select them would be: > > ../DESCRIPTION_ITEM[@row = current()/@row] > Ui, then it was more a syntax problem than a logical, 'cause that's what i theoretically thought it should do. > The latter is probably better simply because if they change the order > on you again it will still work. On the other hand, the former > involves less node visits, so will probably be faster with large > tables. How do you know all this ? :-) It's a small table at the moment. Still i want to learn this all... Thank you so much, Sascha XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] math get maximum and subt, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] math get maximum and subt, sascha |
Re: [xsl] java extension in xsl hel, Zoe Peng | Date | Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Joerg Heinicke |
Month |