Subject: Re: [xsl] processing-instruction() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:05:08 +0100 |
> Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template > has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority > of -0.5: Actually, so did I, and rather than do my usual trick of quoting the spec (incorrectly) from memory I fired it up and read the default priority rules before posting my answer... Of course I forgot to take into account that I'm getting too old to read the spec and skipped over the *or has the form... bit:-) Oh well... David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Jiang, Peiyun |
[xsl] Re: processing-instruction(), Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] java extension in xsl hel, Zoe Peng |
Month |