Subject: RE: [xsl] need help explaining one data structure over another From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 08:56:47 -0500 |
> Help me out [...] an please give me [...] a good argument for why system 2 > is advantageous over system 1. Sorry, I'm going to also vote for system 1. Having done a lot of generic XSLT I definitely prefer an XML input stream that a) does not make any assumptions about how it will be processed; and b) uses XML structure to indicate hierarchy and not element names. In your case, argument d) would seem to be particularly relevant; you've already got a perfectly reasonable way to indicate the relationship of each item to each other (the XML hierarchy) why would you also want to invent an artificial naming convention to duplicate the same information? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] need help explaining one , Jeff Kenton | Thread | RE: [xsl] need help explaining one , Matthew L. Avizinis |
RE: [xsl] Re: nodeset extension in , bryan | Date | Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [xsl] two, Markus . Lehr |
Month |