Re: [xsl] Re:XML and Graphics

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re:XML and Graphics
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:14:01 -0400
Sandy,

You are very welcome. That's what the list is for.

It's true that these technologies have an amazing way of making the core set of problems to which they are addressed, much more tractable, while simultaneously -- by a sort of moral Law of Compensation, I sometimes think -- requiring the developer and/or user to assimilate, or at least to know where to find out about, ever more fiddly bits. The price of "going meta" to solve a problem is that now you have a new layer to learn, while only allowing you to forget *mostly* about the old layer.

In any case, in this context it may be worth mentioning http://www.zvon.org, whose reference site on XML-related technologies (including XSL-FO) can save lots of time. Check it out.

Cheers,
Wendell

At 09:30 AM 8/26/2002, you wrote:
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread