Subject: Re: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:34:00 +0100 |
> But (and hopefully I'm not clouding the issue by saying this :-) > don't forget that it's legal (but uncommon?) for UTF-8 encoded data > to be prefaced by a UTF-8 encoded BOM. > That is, a UTF-8 encoded entity MAY start with > the three byte sequence 0xEF, 0xBB, 0xBF. I think that the utf-8 bom was a later addition to utf8 so as to legalise the output of certain programs originating in Seatle wasn't it? But yes, you are right. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding, Michael Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding, Tony Graham |
RE: [xsl] "Manual web service..." -, Francois Liot | Date | RE: [xsl] Why processor or styleshe, TSchutzerWeissmann |
Month |