Subject: Re: [xsl] HTML <script> tag From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:11:20 -0600 (MDT) |
Andrew Welch wrote: > Very true, but then you have all the added nuances html, some of which > are undesirable (for example if you need to post-process your html, say > with a sax parser). Sounds like you'll be post-processing it anyway. perl -p -i.bak -e '{s/<(\w+)\/>/<$1><\/$1>/g;}' foo.xhtml - Mike ____________________________________________________________________________ mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/ denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] HTML <script> tag, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] HTML <script> tag, Hunsberger, Peter |
Re: [xsl] [FO] Conditional page bre, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] Correspondant to HTML "Input , Technik |
Month |