RE: [xsl] tag minimisation

Subject: RE: [xsl] tag minimisation
From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:52:08 -0700
Hi,

test for text(), if it is there write out the element, else don't.

-Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:27 AM
> To: Xsl-List (E-mail)
> Subject: [xsl] tag minimisation
> 
> 
> 
> When elements like <div></div> get minimised by the processor to <div/>
> it's *really* frustrating.
> 
> I cannot stress how annoying it is to find that because you have an
> element in your data that is empty, you get a minimised ouput element
> where all following elements 'inherit' the style...
> 
> For example:
> 
> <div style="font-weight:bold"/>
> <div>foo</div>
> 
> will give you a bold 'foo'.
> 
> I appreciate that html/css is at fault, but surely its easy to add a
> minimisation='no' extension until browsers catch up...?  That or
> continue the advice of 'add a space to the end of the element to prevent
> it getting minimised'...
> 
> At the moment I can see no real benefit of enforcing minimisation.
> 
> cheers
> andrew
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.385 / Virus Database: 217 - Release Date: 04/09/2002
>  
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread