Re: [xsl] doe alternative?

Subject: Re: [xsl] doe alternative?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:48:03 +0100
MK> you wouldn't expect the XSLT result tree to allow a comment
MK> node to contain an element node, would you?

ah but apparently he would expect the system to apply its XML output
rules on the tree fragment and insert the (a) linearisation into the
comment.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread