RE: [xsl] generalized unique element

["Laura Jenkins" <xsl_list@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks David,Stuart,Mike,kalyan

Sorted my problem out.


> From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [xsl] generalized unique element
> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:09:07 +0100
>
> > Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write
> > Mike>
> > Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::*
> > Mike>               satisfies name($x) != name(.)">
> >
> > Are you _sure_ that's easier than
> >
> > <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]">
> >
>
> Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this
> afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily.
>
> Michael Kay
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list