Subject: Re: [xsl] generalized unique element From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:56:01 +0100 |
> Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this > afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily. I think you should be worried, you've spent so long looking at the xpath2 draft you've started to think it looks natural:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] generalized unique elemen, Laura Jenkins |
RE: [xsl] xsl:fo - keeps and breaks, DPawson | Date | [xsl] using global variables in tem, Felix, Peter |
Month |