Subject: RE: [xsl] OT: XML Node-normalization From: "Lopez, William" <william.lopez@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:15:04 -0500 |
What industry? There are repositories of industry DTDs available, i.e. cXML ( http://www.cxml.org/ ), ebXML ( http://www.ebxml.org/ ), OASIS ( http://oasis-open.org/ ), HL7 ( http://www.hl7.org/ ), Acord (http://www.acord.org/ ) -----Original Message----- From: Nik Krimm [mailto:nik.krimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:13 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] OT: XML Node-normalization Hi all: There is an office controversy brewing about node normalization - where no elements have attributes, only dependent nodes. Supposedly there is an industry trend toward node normalization, and some are worried that we'll be out of sync. However, I have not found any documentation referencing this 'trend' - have you heard anything about this? Can anyone point to any resources for this discussion, or even any thoughts either way? Currently we are using a mix of child nodes and attributes, and this seems intuitively logical to me - but this is the best argument I can make - I just like it better. ;-) TIA, Nik XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] OT: XML Node-normalization, Nik Krimm | Thread | RE: [xsl] OT: XML Node-normalizatio, Nik Krimm |
[xsl] variable in filter doesn't wo, Carter, Will | Date | RE: [xsl] variable in filter doesn', Michael Kay |
Month |