Subject: RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:41:20 +0100 |
> The evaluate() function clearly requires keeping all in-scope > variables available Well, that rather depends on who specifies it... I've been thinking of an approach similar to prepared statements in SQL where the variable parts of a dynamic expression have to be provided explicitly as parameters, rather than allowing the dynamic expression to pick up anything it likes from the context. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Jeff Kenton | Thread | Re: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Jeff Kenton |
RE: [xsl] How do I process a result, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] binary-or, Michael Kay |
Month |