Subject: RE: [xsl] get immediat preceeding node, if it is a comment From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:20:51 +0100 |
> So is it the case that all predicates to the right of the > positional predicate refer to that node? (they change the > context node) The context node, position, and size for evaluation of a filter predicate are based on the list of nodes that remain after applying any previous filters. So $x[2][1] selects $x[2], while $x[1][2] selects nothing. Obvious really... Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] get immediat preceeding n, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] get immediat preceeding n, Passin, Tom |
RE: [xsl] get immediat preceeding n, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] Repeated Recursion on dif, Peter Doggett |
Month |