Subject: RE: [xsl] Using document() From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:30:19 +0100 |
> From http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#function-document: > If the URI reference does not contain a fragment identifier, > then a node-set containing just the root node of the document > is returned. If the URI reference does contain a fragment > identifier, the function returns a node-set containing the > nodes in the tree identified by the fragment identifier of > the URI reference. > And it goes on to say: * The semantics of the fragment identifier depend on the media type of the [resource] * The XSLT processor is not required to support any particular media types Which taken together, means that the XSLT processor is not required to support fragment identifiers. (Indeed, the XSLT processor is not required to support any particular URI schemes, so a processor could still be conformant if it rejected all conceivable URIs...) However, a conformant XSLT processor is required to state in its documentation which URI schemes and media types it supports. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Using document(), Joerg Heinicke | Thread | RE: [xsl] Using document(), Richard Lander |
[xsl] Boolean Fun, Richard Mitchell | Date | RE: RE: [xsl] Expected behavior for, Michael Kay |
Month |