Subject: [xsl] XSLT Processor - root node template & version question From: "Lopez, William" <william.lopez@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:12:13 -0500 |
XSLT Gurus: Q1: Does it matter (speed wise or best practice) if a template is defined for the root element? My understanding is that the root node is automatically processed first by the processor. Example XML: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <!DOCTYPE RouteCodeMaintLookup SYSTEM "../dtd/routecodemaintlookup.dtd" > <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../xsl/routecodemaintlookup.xsl" ?> <RouteCodeMaintLookup ... </RouteCodeMaintLookup> I'm using the [Sniplet] XSL below versus one that has a match="RouteCodeMaintLookup" (output is the same I'm just wondering if one way is better/quicker than the other- they appear to process the same): <?xml version='1.0'?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.1" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:template match="/"> ... <form name="LookUpForm" method="post" action="{@servletPath}"> <table> <xsl:apply-templates/> </table> ... </xsl:template> Q2: Since the XSLT 1.1 never made it past WD status is there any gain in specifying it? I use Xalan-j. Thanks! -Will XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT Processor - root nod, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT Processor - root nod, Terje Norderhaug |
Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, Jeff Kenton | Date | RE: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, Eric van der Vlist |
Month |