Subject: Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT? From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:23:41 +0100 |
Hi David, >> I'm surprised no one brought up XQuery; mind you, it doesn't have >> templates, I suppose, so it doesn't quite fit the bill... > > surely you weren't suggesting that anyone would actually like > xquery's looks like xml but isn't syntax? No, but I do have a *bit* of a soft spot for XQuery's *non-XML* element/attribute creation syntax, especially since it looks so similar to RELAX NG: element foo { attribute bar { 'baz' } } If XQuery dropped the pseudo-XML and adopted XSLT's processing paradigm, they could be onto a winner ;) Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Extending Java Classes in XSL, Kurt Cagle |
Re: [xsl] HTML to XML via XSL ?, Geoff Hankerson | Date | RE: [xsl] [ANN] Announcing ActiveSt, DPawson |
Month |