Subject: Re: [xsl] fxt xslt comparison From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:31:19 -0400 |
I was wondering if anyone had looked at fxt http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~aberlea/Fxt/userGuide.html#fxt_actio ns and if they had any comments, to me it seemed like no improvement on xslt. Does anyone see something it does better, or stuff it does which might be better used in xslt 2.0?
Perhaps this should be the question for xslt 2.0; is there some transformation language out there that does something xslt does not do well, what is that thing and how should it be handled in xslt 2.0?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
-- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton DataPower Technology, Inc.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] fxt xslt comparison, bryan | Thread | Re: [xsl] fxt xslt comparison, Jeff Kenton |
Re: [xsl] adding attributes to an e, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] fxt xslt comparison, Jeff Kenton |
Month |