Subject: Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL From: Antonio Gallardo Rivera <agallardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:45:21 -0600 |
Try, Cocoon at: http://xml.apache.org/cocoon Antonio Gallardo El Jueves, 17 de Octubre de 2002 07:15, Mark Micallef escribió: > Hi All, > > I've spent considerable time setting up an architecture using XML and XSL > in order to produce a help-system for one of our software products. I feel > using this system is much better than using a WYSIWYG editor because it > allows the writer to concentrate on content and not on formatting. > Formatting can be done by a different person or at a different time via XSL > style-sheets. > > I've pitched this idea to my manager and he likes it but when we sent the > whole package of to our head-office abroad for translation into different > languages, they didn't like it. They prefer using a WYSIWYG editor > (specifically ROBOHELP). > > My gut feel is XML is better even tho a WYSIWYG editor allows you to see > results immediately without compiling or anything. > > Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Am I right or wrong? If so, > why? > > Thanks for your help, > > Mark > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Robert Koberg | Thread | RE: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Lee V |
Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] flattening html table wit, Graham Seaman |
Month |