|
Subject: Re: Functional Language wasRE: [xsl] Re: declarative language, need for loops etc. From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:42:24 +0100 |
> Does that mean you don't like XQuery? Sir, I don't see how you could possibly suggest that a paragraph that starts "One might be tempted" and ends "But surely that can't possibly be the case" might give any indication of my personal opinion. It _might_ be the case that I think Xquery (and XPath2) are really really nice. It might be... David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Functional Language wasRE: [xsl, Jeff Kenton | Thread | Re: Functional Language wasRE: [xsl, Kurt Cagle |
| RE: [xsl] Requested review, xml 2 j, Robert Koberg | Date | Re: [xsl] Alternating Odd and Even , Joerg Heinicke |
| Month |