Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution

Subject: Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:39:47 GMT
> Everything that comes under serialization is a "should" because
> serialization itself is optional.

yes i understand why html output method is optional, I'm just not sure
that it couldn't be more specified in teh cases that teh ssystem choses
to support it.

> My own view (and the way that XSLT 2.0 may go) is that serialization
> should be an optional conformance module, and that most of the things
> within it should then be "must"s.

sounds good to me.

> XSLT 2.0 already has an option to switch off the generation of the
> <META> element, on the grounds that users may prefer to do it
> themselves.

users may say they prefer it, but will they get it right:-)


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread