Subject: RE: [xsl] The beginning of xslt? From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:27:39 +1100 |
Hi Jarkko. This thread from xml-dev might point you in the right direction in terms of the history of XSLT. http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200210/msg01610.html Regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jarkko > Moilanen > Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:34 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] The beginning of xslt? > > > > > How did the development of xslt begin? Is there a person who said that something > like this would be needed? I came to this question, while I was doing some > research about xslt development. > > Users <---------> xslt language > ^ ^ ^ ^ > | \ / | > | \ __________/ | > | \_/______ | > | / \ | > | / \ | > | / \ | > | / \ | > v v v v > Processors <----> xsl-list/w3c > > In here the users need the language (arrow between Users and xslt language) > and also take part in the development of next version (arrow to xsl-list/w3c). > Also the users get help from the list to their problems in xslt. Users > need the processors to ecxecute xslt. > > Processor developers are restricted (partly) about the language, or to be > more specific, restricted about the specification. (arrow between Processors and xsl-list) > Developers offer programs to ecxecute xslt.(arrow between Users and Processors) > > Xsl-list/w3c is intrested about the language, ie. specification. Also distributes > help to users and offers limits and possibilities in the form of spesification. > > > In this framework if the xslt language "disappears", the situation is the > same as the development of xslt was in the beginning.The situation then also means that there can not > be any users or processors. So where came the idea about xslt in the beginning, from > w3c? > > If the Processors "disappear", situationis that there can not be any users, > but the language and xsl-list/w3c can excist. > > If there is no xsl-list/w3c, nothing else can excist. (in the framework of xslt) > > The main question is still the same: > where came the idea about xslt in the beginning? > > And how did we end up to this situation,as the figure above shows? > > Cheers, > Jarkko > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > Tiedon voi hankkia kolmella tavalla: > AJATTELEMALLA, se on jalo tapa > YRITYKSEN JA EREHDYKSEN KAUTTA, se on kova tie > MATKIMALLA, se on helppo tapa > Konfutse > _____________________________________________________________________ > Jarkko Moilanen :) www.uta.fi/~jm60697 =) puh. 040-5112113 :) Smile!! > ---------------------Cogito ergo sum--------------------------------- > PS. Älä varasta - hallitus vihaa kilpailua! > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] The beginning of xslt?, Jarkko Moilanen | Thread | RE: [xsl] The beginning of xslt?, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Interesting issue, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] The beginning of xslt?, Michael Kay |
Month |