Subject: Re: [xsl] Peculiar Problem in .xsl file From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:39:05 GMT |
> [Note, this kind of problem is one of the reasons that many people are > so keen to add stronger typing to the language]. Hardly. Xpath1 typing is pretty simplistic and most implementations get most of it right, even if this thread has uncovered a bug somewhere. Finding two schema implemenations that agree on the interpretation of the schema spec is a far more difficult challenge.... David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Peculiar Problem in .xsl , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Peculiar Problem in .xsl , Gunther Schadow |
Re: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , DPawson |
Month |