Subject: Réf. : Re: [xsl] sequential navigation problem (long) From: Jakob.Fix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:10:16 +0100 |
Joerg, I used the phrase "similar to DocBook" just to be sure that people understand what I am trying to explain, because most people know the DocBook stylesheets. Our actual data is *completely* different. However, I *am* using the CALS table conversion templates from the DocBook stylesheet distribution. Cheers, Jakob. Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx>@lists.mulberrytech.com on 12/07/2002 02:10:38 AM Veuillez répondre à xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Envoyé par : owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Pour : xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc : Objet : Re: [xsl] sequential navigation problem (long) Ref. Message: Jakob.Fix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I am working on a stylesheet that's fragmenting a big document into smaller > parts using GIs; the idea as well as navigation is very similar to the > DocBook stylesheets. But if it is similar to DocBook, why don't you use DocBook? Too much overhead? Joerg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XML / XSLT Congress / Confere, Jarkko Moilanen | Thread | RE: [xsl] sequential navigation pro, Jakob . Fix |
Re: [xsl] Identity of Documents Puz, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] nodeset namespace, Michael Kay |
Month |